Friday, July 23, 2010

Well if MSNBC reported it, it's official...

The big thinking in condos now is to get small
Urban dwellers get by in new projects where 600 square feet is spacious


Image: Cubix condominiums
Olga Soboleva
The 98-unit Cubix condominiums in San Francisco start at 250 square feet and top out at 350. The building is about two-thirds sold.
by Jane Hodges contributor
updated 7/8/2010 12:20:49 PM ET

Alexandra Gorbokon, a 26-year old public relations executive, has made an offer on her first home, a condo in downtown Chicago. She’s looking forward to eliminating her one-hour commute to and from the suburbs and filling her newfound free time with a better gym habit, enjoying her new neighborhood, and serving on a board in her building.

She’s a little less excited about squeezing her stuff into her new home’s tiny 600 square foot space. But she acknowledges that, at her age and with her modest $150,000 home price limit, living in a small space is a minor tradeoff for access to an urban lifestyle.

“I’m a little concerned about the size. I think it’s easy to grow out of this sort of space,” she says. “But I wanted to live in the city while I was still young.”

Gorbokon’s attitude about real estate is typical of her generation’s, says John McIlwain, a senior fellow for housing at The Urban Land Institute in Washington D.C. McIlwain says many new in-city condo and apartment buildings are offering smaller footprints to satisfy not only downsizing Baby Boomers but, especially, members of Generation Y who are moving out of dorms and parents' places and setting up their own households. Generation Y, he says, views a home’s location as more important than its size. They may also see living small and in-city as an environmentally responsible lifestyle.

“For Gen Y, the home is a place to live out of, not to live in,” he says. “They don’t think of this as a sacrifice. It’s just their lifestyle.”

The 'new small'
So with this renter and buyer in mind, numerous condo and apartment developers around the country are designing new homes with square footages resembling — and even far less than — Gorbokon's new home.

“Based on our experience, while anything under 1000 square feet is considered small nationally, the ‘new small’ might really average out at somewhere around 500 square feet,” says Janel Laban, executive editor for the interiors blog Apartment Therapy, which runs an annual “Small Cool” decorating contest. “Quality of life, which is often strongly affected by location, trumps size every time.”

A brief survey of completed and forthcoming buildings shows that with small-space projects, the more expensive a city, the smaller its definition of “small.” While mellow Portland, Ore., boasts 520-square foot homes, San Francisco’s “small” ranges from 250 to 350 square feet. Vancouver, British Columbia is smallest of all: There, a building called Burns Block will next year start leasing 30 “micro-lofts” with 270-square feet of space and prices starting around $700 per month. The tiny lofts might offer more room than a basement or converted spare room. Vancouver recently passed rules allowing homeowners to rent out accessory units as small as 195 square feet, according to The National Post.

Cubicle living
The 98-unit Cubix condominium building in San Francisco’s trendy SOMA (South of Market) district has sold about 66 of its tiny loft units, which start at 250 square feet and top out at 350, to a mix of young adults as well as to a surprising number of buyers in their 30s and 40s, says Jim Hurley, a broker with Vanguard Properties who is the project’s sales manager.

Image: Cubix's tiny homes range from $200,000 to $250,000. A low  price for San Francisco.
Olga Soboleva
Cubix's tiny homes range from $200,000 to $250,000. A low price for San Francisco.

“The mix of buyers isn’t skewed as young as you’d think,” Hurley says, noting that many buyers wanted second homes or split their lives between a job in San Francisco and a home elsewhere. “The demographic has been surprisingly broad.”

Ranging in price from $200,000 to $250,000, the tiny units are stylish — with concrete floors, stainless steel appliances, stone bath surrounds, and energy-efficient passive ventilation. The Cubix compensates for its units’ small size with a transit-friendly location, community amenities (like Cubix’s rooftop “glass house” common area), and proximity to services (Whole Foods is nearby). Hurley says one new resident just completed her MBA, happily ditched her car to live downtown, and uses nearby regional train transit, public buses, car-sharing, or her own two feet to get around.

Shoebox Lofts
In Portland, Ore., small is a little bigger. The cheekily-named Shoebox Lofts, set to begin construction later in 2010, will share themes seen at Cubix and other small-footprint developments. The Shoebox’s layout includes two buildings linked by a courtyard, along with ground-floor retail and amenities such as bike storage and repair space. Because the building is set on a major bus corridor and in-city bike route, it won’t offer car parking but, instead, biker-friendly features like storage and a “bike repair” room. It’s within walking or biking distance to the city’s artsy Mississippi and Alberta areas.

The 17-unit project’s 520-square foot units will offer 16-foot ceilings and prices below $200,000, says developer Jon Gustafson. Portland-based di Loreto Architecture designed the spaces with a minimalist urban feel, says project designer Chris LoNigro. The look includes concrete floors, steel-joisted ceilings, and floor-to-ceiling “garage door” windows partially shaded with exterior wooden screens.

“It’s definitely a different lifestyle choice,” Gustafson acknowledges. “I wanted the spaces to be open so the owner could decide how to live in them.”

“This sort of smaller space we’re building is going to be important to the diversity of a lot of neighborhoods in the future,” he says, noting that other condo builders offering larger units can’t help but price them for twice as much. “It’s a place to get started.”

Also forthcoming: Two small-footprint developments in the Bay Area, each comprised of 300-square foot modular-built housing units from Zeta Communities, which has designed and is manufacturing what it calls SmartSpaces from a facility in Sacramento. The two projects — a 22-unit San Francisco condominium complex and a Berkeley apartment community — are currently “on hold” given the market, says Zeta Communities spokesperson Shilpa Sankaran.

“The demand is there,” she says. “There’s a high percentage of people in the San Francisco area who are single and can live in these units.”

Trend toward downsizing
The push to introduce smaller-footprint homes is reflective of the reversal in home size that’s taken place in recent years, says Stephen Melman, a spokesman for the National Association of Home Builders in Washington D.C. Melman, citing census data, says that the median size of newly-built condominiums peaked at 1,472 square feet in 2007, but fell to 1,355 square feet in 2008. (2009 data aren’t yet available.)

Indeed, buyers of smaller condos reason that, when and if they tire of a small space, they can rent it. Condominium associations of micro-unit buildings sometimes anticipate that owners of these units will, eventually, move up and out and may want to sublet. Cubix will let owners sublet units, but for 30 or more days at a time so as to prevent excess turnover or vacation renting, Hurley says.

“I made a big down payment and sought out permission to rent my place down the line,” says Gorbokon, the Chicago buyer, who, like many builders of small-footprint spaces, is planning ahead for a future where there will be plenty of demand for small spaces among those seeking big-city living.

Jane Hodges ( is a Seattle-based business journalist.

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Buyer Beware

A lot goes into buying a house as I’ve begun to find out over the last few weeks since making an offer. I’ll go into all that later, but one important thing is to understand the inner workings of your homeowner’s association (HOA).

I was devastated when I heard this story on my commute to work a few weeks ago: Not So Neighborly Associations Foreclosing On Homes. While someone was serving in Iraq, his wife missed two HOA payments. By the time he got back, the HOA foreclosed on his $300k house, which was already completely paid off, and sold for $3,500. Shocking, I know. Luckily for this family, they do have some legal recourse since the gentleman was in the military:
“In a spasm of gratitude in 2003, Congress passed the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, which was supposed to prevent nonjudicial foreclosures against military personnel fighting overseas.”
For the rest of us, a few lessons to be learned here:
  • Before purchasing a home, condo, whatever, figure out how much the building has in “reserves” and if the association charges “master association fees.”
  • In other words, if something large breaks, will you have to pay above and beyond your monthly assessment? If the reserves are low, the answer is likely YES. If the roof needs to be fixed and it’s a $10,000 cost, that cost will be split among you and your neighbors, unless your building has deep reserves and uses them in emergencies.
  • Speaking of emergencies, most small associations only operate on an "as-needed" basis. Make sure you properly maintain the house on a regular basis to avoid emergencies. When there's an emergency, it'll end up being more costly in the end to fix the roof or whatever needs fixing.
  • Another thing to consider is joining your board. Make sure to get involved, after all you wouldn't let someone else make decisions about the money in your checking account, right? So don't let them make decisions about your reserves (it's YOUR money!)
These are just some ideas to get your started. Be involved and avoid regret later! And of course, pay your bills.

Real Simple Dinner

I tell everyone who cares to listen, you don't have to be a culinary genius to make yourself a home-cooked meal. I for one, am not a culinary genius of any kind. In fact a few weeks ago, while making dinner for two, I cut two fingers (I'll spare you the images). Despite these setbacks, I thought dinner turned out pretty darn delicious.

My approach to cooking is fairly straightforward. I usually cook things I ate growing up, because otherwise something tastes "off" to me. Luckily for me, veggies, grains, fish, chicken, lamb were all a part of my mother's repertoire, and cookies were not.

I also tend to cook meals that are simple, quick to create and somewhat healthy. The last element of my approach is to refine a dish and then make variations of it. Today, SALMON!

Salmon is super easy to make. I purchase the wild-caught, frozen salmon filet from Trader Joe's.

  • Defrost over night in the fridge and then lay it on a cookie sheet or baking dish lined with foil.
  • Drizzle EVOO & sprinkle salt, pepper and one other spice (dried chives today, paprika on other days).
  • Stick it in the oven for about ten minutes+.
  • You'll know it's ready by looking at it or you can always cut in half and take a small bite. The salmon should flake and should be absolutely delicious.
  • Tonight I switched it up by using an idea from a recipe from my Real Simple magazine. The recipe called for basting the fish in the last two minutes in two tbsp brown sugar and one tbsp soy sauce (which I mixed, prior to basting).

This was quite yummy!

I also like to add some sort of grain or starch to every meal (pasta, bread, rice, buckwheat, quinoa...etc). Today it was potatoes.

  • I cubed the potatoes
  • Sliced an onion
  • Cut up some white mushrooms
  • Fried it on high for a couple of minutes until it browned and then put it on low to finish the cooking process.
I like to use EVOO for this with a bit of butter. If you want to make it healthier toss it in the oven with EVOO so nothing burns.

And of course, no meal is complete without a veggie. I didn't have enough veggies (or energy) for a salad so I cut up a tomato and an orange pepper.

If I can do it, so can you :). Good luck to you and Bon Appetit!